<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keyword Meta Tags Still Matter!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radarfarms.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/keyword-meta-tags-still-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radarfarms.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/keyword-meta-tags-still-matter/</link>
	<description>RadarFarms news plus our view on Web 2.0 topics - newsmastering, mashups, long tail advertising and SEO.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: XP Embedded Computers</title>
		<link>http://radarfarms.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/keyword-meta-tags-still-matter/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>XP Embedded Computers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radarfarms.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Hhhm, interesting. Ive always believed that the keyword meta tag should be treated as a live ranking factor. I heard people say that Google may look at the semantic similarities between the keyword meta tag and the on page content.

I also add common spelling mistakes to the keyword meta tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hhhm, interesting. Ive always believed that the keyword meta tag should be treated as a live ranking factor. I heard people say that Google may look at the semantic similarities between the keyword meta tag and the on page content.</p>
<p>I also add common spelling mistakes to the keyword meta tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
